Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900X outperforms Core i3-380M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900X is 2915 days newer than Core i3-380M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-380M
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900X - 35 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900X
- Performs up to 14% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-380M - 188 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-380M - 20 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
188
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.7/FPS
100%
Price, €
€695.4
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €695.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 186 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Oct 26th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-380M | vs | Intel Core i9-9900X |
---|---|---|
Oct 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Arrandale | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 165 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |