Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3570 outperforms Core i3-380M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-3570 is 584 days newer than Core i3-380M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-380M
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Core i5-3570 - 35 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3570
- Performs up to 4% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-380M - 118 vs 113 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-380M doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
118
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.72/FPS
100%
Price, €
€85.41
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €85.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Oct 26th, 2010
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-380M | vs | Intel Core i5-3570 |
---|---|---|
Oct 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Arrandale | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 77 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |