Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100 outperforms Core i3-380M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-13100 is 4453 days newer than Core i3-380M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-380M
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i3-13100 - 35 vs 60 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100
- Performs up to 12% better in World of Tanks than Core i3-380M - 563 vs 501 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-380M - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-380M doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
563
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€152.31
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €152.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 175 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Oct 26th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-380M | vs | Intel Core i3-13100 |
---|---|---|
Oct 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Arrandale | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 60 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |