Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms Core i3-350M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 5031 days newer than Core i3-350M.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 36% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-350M - 225 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-350M - 32 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
225
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.08/FPS
100%
Price, €
€467.89
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €467.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 429 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-350M | vs | Intel Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Arrandale | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |