Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms Core i3-350M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 4086 days newer than Core i3-350M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-350M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105F - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 29% better in Dota 2 than Core i3-350M - 206 vs 160 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-350M - 8 vs 4 threads
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
206
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€73
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1075 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-350M | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Arrandale | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |