Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3250 outperforms Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-3250 is 175 days older than Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Performs up to 1% better in Dirt 5 than Celeron G1820 - 143 vs 141 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i3-3250 - 53 vs 55 Watts
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
141
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€35.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €35.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 180 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 53 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |