Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7940HS outperforms Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7940HS is 3518 days newer than Core i3-3250.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
- Performs up to 13% better in Death Stranding than Core i3-3250 - 242 vs 214 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 16 vs 4 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i3-3250
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Ryzen 9 7940HS
Mobile • Jan 26th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 26th, 2023 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket FP8 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 55 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
| No | Overclockable | No |
