Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800X outperforms Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800X is 2219 days newer than Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3800X - 55 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3800X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
- Performs up to 14% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-3250 - 136 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 16 vs 4 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
136
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€290.43
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €290.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3800X |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |