Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 1481 days newer than Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 55 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 5% better in Remnant II than Core i3-3250 - 83 vs 79 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 64 vs 4 threads
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | EPYC |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Naples |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
2 | Cores | 32 |
4 | Threads | 64 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |