Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900 outperforms Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900 is 3116 days newer than Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 7% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i3-3240T - 267 vs 250 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 16 vs 4 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €307.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76589 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
447
20.985915492957748%
Multi-Core
971
11.014065335753177%
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | Intel Core i9-11900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | No |