Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600KF outperforms Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9600KF is 2318 days newer than Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i5-9600KF - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600KF
- Performs up to 7% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i3-3240T - 160 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 6 vs 4 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
160
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.44/FPS
100%
Price, €
€389.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €389.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 0 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | Intel Core i5-9600KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |