Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3500X outperforms Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3500X is 2577 days newer than Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3500X - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3500X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3500X
- Performs up to 31% better in Rust than Core i3-3240T - 202 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 6 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 24th, 2019
FPS
202
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€72.43
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €72.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 965 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 24th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3500X |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 24th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |