Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3240 outperforms FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-3240 is 238 days older than FX-4350.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 55 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Currently N/A on Amazon
Out of Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3240 | vs | AMD FX-4350 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |