Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1840 outperforms Core i3-3227U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1840 is 478 days newer than Core i3-3227U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3227U
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than Intel Celeron G1840 - 17 vs 53 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Performs up to 6% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-3227U - 450 vs 426 FPS
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-3227U
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2013
Celeron G1840
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3227U | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 8th, 2013 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
| 1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
17 W | TDP | 53 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
