Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3950X outperforms Core i3-3227U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3950X is 2512 days newer than Core i3-3227U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3227U
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3950X - 17 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
- Performs up to 24% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-3227U - 182 vs 147 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3227U - 32 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
182
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€579.7
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €579.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 80 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2013
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3227U | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3950X |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |