Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700 outperforms Core i3-3220T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700 is 2796 days newer than Core i3-3220T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700
- Performs up to 19% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-3220T - 179 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220T - 16 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-3220T
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Core i7-10700
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3220T
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
458
28.969006957621758%
Multi-Core
941
13.423680456490727%
Intel Core i3-3220T | vs | Intel Core i7-10700 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
