Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5800X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5800X3D is 3516 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 92% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5800X3D - €25.06 vs €324.95
- Up to 86% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 7 5800X3D - €0.1 vs €0.71 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D - 55 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D
- Performs up to 88% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-3220 - 460 vs 245 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 16 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €25.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 97 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
FPS
460
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.71/FPS
14%
Price, €
€324.95
7%
FPS Winner
Buy for €324.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 20th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |