Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Core i3-3217U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3869 days newer than Core i3-3217U.
Advantages of Core i3-3217U
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 17 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 3% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i3-3217U - 195 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3217U - 32 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
195
100%
Value, €/FPS
€6.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1199
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,199 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 145 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3217U | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 120 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |