Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 2751 days newer than Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Consumes up to 80% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 55 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Performs up to 27% better in Dota 2 than Core i3-3210 - 214 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 64 vs 4 threads
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
214
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€2846.24
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for €2,846.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77549 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Single-Core
509
30.75528700906344%
Multi-Core
1018
6.982646272035119%
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 32 |
4 | Threads | 64 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 280 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |