Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms Core i3-3120M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 2575 days newer than Core i3-3120M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3120M
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 35 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 20% better in Battlefield V than Core i3-3120M - 246 vs 205 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3120M - 20 vs 4 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
246
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.71/FPS
100%
Price, €
€665.91
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €665.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 30th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3120M | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 30th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Cascade Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 165 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |