Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms Core i3-2310M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 3376 days newer than Core i3-2310M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2310M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 17% better in No Man's Sky than Core i3-2310M - 181 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2310M - 20 vs 4 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-2310M
Mobile • Feb 1st, 2011
Core i9-10900
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2310M | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 1st, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 10 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
