Key Differences
In short — Core i3-2100 outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-2100 is 234 days older than the cheaper FX-4100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2100
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-4100 - 168 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 28% cheaper than Core i3-2100 - €18.39 vs €25.68
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €25.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74419 minutes ago
Buy for €18.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74419 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2100 | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
---|---|---|
Feb 20th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |