Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-14100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-14100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 83 days older than the cheaper Core i3-14100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100F
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - €146.18 vs €639.3
- Up to 74% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-14900K - €0.28 vs €1.06 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 17% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-14100F - 605 vs 517 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-14100F - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-14100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
517
85%
Value, €/FPS
€0.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€146.18
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €146.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 621 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
605
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.06/FPS
26%
Price, €
€639.3
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for €639.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 621 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-14100F | vs | Intel Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |