Key Differences
In short — Core i3-14100F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-14100F is 2106 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100F
- Performs up to 25% better in Remnant II than Celeron G4900 - 100 vs 80 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i3-14100F - €60.24 vs €140.88
- Up to 47% better value when playing Remnant II than Core i3-14100F - €0.75 vs €1.41 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-14100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
100
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.41/FPS
53%
Price, €
€140.88
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for €140.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 195 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
80
80%
Value, €/FPS
€0.75/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.24
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 195 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-14100F | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 54 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |