Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3570S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3570S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-13100F is 3869 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3570S.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100F
- Performs up to 26% better in Battlefield V than Core i5-3570S - 268 vs 213 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3570S - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3570S
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i3-13100F - €55.01 vs €113.76
- Up to 38% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i3-13100F - €0.26 vs €0.42 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-13100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
268
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
61%
Price, €
€113.76
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for €113.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 110 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
213
79%
Value, €/FPS
€0.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€55.01
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €55.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 110 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-13100F | vs | Intel Core i5-3570S |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |