Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-13100F is 3170 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100F
- Performs up to 7% better in Dead Space than Core i3-4150 - 159 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Up to 35% cheaper than Core i3-13100F - €78.99 vs €121.92
- Up to 31% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i3-13100F - €0.53 vs €0.77 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-13100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
159
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.77/FPS
68%
Price, €
€121.92
64%
FPS Winner
Buy for €121.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 167 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
149
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.53/FPS
100%
Price, €
€78.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €78.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 169 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-13100F | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 54 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |