Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-13100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-13100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 1136 days older than the cheaper Core i3-13100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100F
- Up to 92% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - €126.59 vs €1506.42
- Up to 91% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - €0.68 vs €7.77 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 5% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i3-13100F - 194 vs 185 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-13100F - 48 vs 8 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
185
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.68/FPS
100%
Price, €
€126.59
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €126.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 34 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
194
100%
Value, €/FPS
€7.77/FPS
8%
Price, €
€1506.42
8%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,506.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 30 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-13100F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 48 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 280 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |