Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Core i5-3330S on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 3431 days newer than Core i5-3330S.
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 21% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-3330S - 205 vs 169 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i5-3330S - 58 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3330S - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Core i5-3330S
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i3-12100F
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Core i5-3330S
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-12100F | vs | Core i5-3330S |
|---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Alder Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
58 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
