Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100 outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100 is 2675 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100
- Performs up to 40% better in Starfield than Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 70 vs 50 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 60 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100 - 20 vs 8 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-12100 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
60 W | TDP | 105 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |