Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 11% better in War Thunder than Core i3-7100 - 188 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Up to 94% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - €12.0 vs €216.77
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 51 vs 65 Watts
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Buy for €216.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 222 minutes ago
Buy for €12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 223 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1247
81.02664067576349%
Multi-Core
2440
52.7453523562473%
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |