Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 635 days newer than Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 15% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-10320 - 664 vs 575 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 58 vs 65 Watts
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
575
86.59638554216868%
Value, €/FPS
€0.38/FPS
100%
Price, €
€216.77
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €216.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1539
69.16853932584269%
Multi-Core
4626
62.03567118144026%
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 58 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |