Buy on Amazon
€199.5
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $549
Availability
MSRP in USD: $549
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 973 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 207 vs 201 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 8% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - €183.04 vs €199.5
- Up to 5% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-10320 - €0.91 vs €0.96 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 16 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Intel Core i3-10320 (Basistakt: 3,80GHZ; Sockel: LGA1200; 65Watt) Box, BX8070110320 Black
Buy for €199.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 140 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
201
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.91/FPS
100%
Price, €
€183.04
100%
Value Winner
AMD RYZEN THREADRIPPER 1900X 4.0GH
Buy for €183.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 143 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 38.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
