Buy on Amazon
€216.77
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $109
Availability
MSRP in USD: $109
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 1200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 1200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 1008 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 1200.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 15% better in Starfield than Ryzen 3 1200 - 60 vs 52 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 1200 - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 1200 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1200
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - €59.94 vs €216.77
- Up to 68% better value when playing Starfield than Core i3-10320 - €1.15 vs €3.61 per FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
60
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.61/FPS
31.855955678670362%
Price, €
€216.77
27%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i3-10320 (Basistakt: 3,80GHZ; Sockel: LGA1200; 65Watt) Box, BX8070110320 Black
Buy for €216.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 99 minutes ago
Ryzen 3 1200
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
FPS
52
86.66666666666667%
Value, €/FPS
€1.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€59.94
100%
Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 3 1200 3.1GHz
Buy for €59.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Ryzen 3 1200
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 3 1200
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Single-Core
984
63.93762183235867%
Multi-Core
2834
61.26242974492002%
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 1200 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2017 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
