Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 4007 days newer than Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 12% better in Overwatch 2 than Phenom II X4 925 - 353 vs 314 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 8 vs 4 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
353
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.61/FPS
100%
Price, €
€216.77
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €216.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1658 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Single-Core
320
20.79272254710851%
Multi-Core
930
20.103761348897535%
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | AMD Phenom II X4 925 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | May 11th, 2009 |
Core i3 | Collection | Phenom II X4 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Deneb |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 14.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | No |