Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 233 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105T
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - €216.6 vs €389.56
- Up to 27% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-12900KF - €0.4 vs €0.55 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 30% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-10105T - 706 vs 541 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105T - 24 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
541
76%
Value, €/FPS
€0.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€216.6
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €216.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
706
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.55/FPS
72%
Price, €
€389.56
55%
FPS Winner
Buy for €389.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105T | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |