Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10980XE outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10980XE is 514 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 95% cheaper than Core i9-10980XE - €74.02 vs €1355.1
- Up to 94% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i9-10980XE - €0.56 vs €10.11 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-10980XE - 65 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10980XE
- Performs up to 2% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i3-10105F - 134 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 36 vs 8 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
132
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.56/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €74.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 116 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
134
100%
Value, €/FPS
€10.11/FPS
5%
Price, €
€1355.1
5%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,355.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 117 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | Intel Core i9-10980XE |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Comet Lake | Codename | Cascade Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 18 |
8 | Threads | 36 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 165 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |