Buy on Amazon
€73.87
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10105F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-7700 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10105F is 1533 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-7700.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield V than Core i7-7700 - 240 vs 238 FPS
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i7-7700 - €73.87 vs €203.76
- Up to 64% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i7-7700 - €0.31 vs €0.86 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-10105F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
240
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€73.87
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i3-10105F 10. Generation Desktop Prozessor (Basistakt: 3.7GHz Tuboboost: 4.4GHz, 4 Kerne, LGA1200) BX8070110105F
Buy for €73.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 34 minutes ago
Intel Core i7-7700 Prozessor der 7. Generation (bis zu 3.6 GHz mit Intel Turbo-Boost-Technik 2.0, 8 MB Intel Smart-Cache)
Buy for €203.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-10105F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Core i7-7700
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | Intel Core i7-7700 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
