Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2500 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2500 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 3719 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2500.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 7% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i5-2500 - 295 vs 276 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-2500 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2500 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i3-10105F - €35.61 vs €74.04
- Up to 48% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i3-10105F - €0.13 vs €0.25 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
295
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.25/FPS
52%
Price, €
€74.04
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for €74.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
276
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€35.61
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €35.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | Intel Core i5-2500 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |