Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10105F outperforms the more expensive Core i3-4170 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10105F is 2511 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-4170.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 7% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i3-4170 - 206 vs 193 FPS
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i3-4170 - €70.51 vs €146.34
- Up to 55% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i3-4170 - €0.34 vs €0.76 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4170 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4170
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
206
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€70.51
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €70.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4342 minutes ago
Buy for €146.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4342 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | Intel Core i3-4170 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |