Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2388G outperforms Core i3-10105 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2388G is 176 days newer than Core i3-10105.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E-2388G - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2388G
- Performs up to 7% better in Deathloop than Core i3-10105 - 191 vs 179 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105 - 16 vs 8 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
179
93.717277486911%
Value, €/FPS
€0.57/FPS
100%
Price, €
€101.47
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €101.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58237 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Single-Core
1487
64.70844212358573%
Multi-Core
4609
46.12228559991994%
Intel Core i3-10105 | vs | Intel Xeon E-2388G |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E |
Comet Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P750 |
No | Overclockable | No |