Buy on Amazon
€94.66
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10920X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10920X is 514 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10105.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i9-10920X - €94.66 vs €914.15
- Up to 89% better value when playing Death Stranding than Core i9-10920X - €0.42 vs €3.99 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-10920X - 65 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10920X
- Performs up to 1% better in Death Stranding than Core i3-10105 - 229 vs 227 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105 - 24 vs 8 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i3-10105
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
227
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€94.66
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i3-10105 10. Generation Desktop Prozessor (Basistakt: 3.7GHz Tuboboost: 4.4GHz, 4 Kerne, LGA1200) BX8070110105
Buy for €94.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 189 minutes ago
Core i9-10920X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
229
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.99/FPS
10%
Price, €
€914.15
10%
FPS Winner
Core i9-10920X (3.5 GHz / 4.6 GHz)
Buy for €914.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 189 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i3-10105
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Core i9-10920X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105 | vs | Intel Core i9-10920X |
|---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Cascade Lake |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 12 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 165 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
