Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105 outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105 is 3443 days newer than the cheaper FX-4100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Performs up to 7% better in Death Stranding than FX-4100 - 227 vs 213 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i3-10105 - €18.39 vs €101.47
- Up to 80% better value when playing Death Stranding than Core i3-10105 - €0.09 vs €0.45 per FPS
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
227
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.45/FPS
20%
Price, €
€101.47
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for €101.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44001 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
213
93.83259911894272%
Value, €/FPS
€0.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€18.39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €18.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44001 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105 | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |