Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 and the cheaper Core i3-10100 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Up to 45% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - €110.49 vs €199.5
- Up to 45% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i3-10320 - €0.69 vs €1.25 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 1% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i3-10100 - 160 vs 159 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i3-10100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
159
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.69/FPS
100%
Price, €
€110.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €110.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6216 minutes ago
Buy for €199.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6215 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10100 | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |