Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G3250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G3250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 2724 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G3250.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 14% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Pentium G3250 - 135 vs 118 FPS
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3250
- Up to 67% cheaper than Celeron G6900 - €22.7 vs €69.58
- Up to 63% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Celeron G6900 - €0.19 vs €0.52 per FPS
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
135
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
36.53846153846153%
Price, €
€69.58
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for €69.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 24 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
118
87.4074074074074%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€22.7
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €22.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 85014 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
576
35.932626325639426%
Multi-Core
981
36.38724035608308%
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Pentium G3250 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Celeron | Collection | Pentium |
Alder Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 53 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |