Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 808 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900X.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 2% better in The Callisto Protocol than Core i9-10900X - 126 vs 124 FPS
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i9-10900X - €66.9 vs €659.85
- Up to 90% better value when playing The Callisto Protocol than Core i9-10900X - €0.53 vs €5.32 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 20 vs 2 threads
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
126
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.53/FPS
100%
Price, €
€66.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €66.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55048 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
124
98.4126984126984%
Value, €/FPS
€5.32/FPS
9.962406015037594%
Price, €
€659.85
10%
Buy for €659.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55049 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Alder Lake | Codename | Cascade Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 165 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |