Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 539 days older than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Up to 94% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - €67.66 vs €1099.9
- Up to 94% better value when playing Valheim than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - €0.33 vs €5.37 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 0% better in Valheim than Celeron G6900 - 205 vs 204 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 32 vs 2 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
204
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.33/FPS
100%
Price, €
€67.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €67.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10951 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
205
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.37/FPS
6%
Price, €
€1099.9
6%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,099.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10952 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Alder Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 280 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |