Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 1222 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 7% better in Dota 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 212 vs 198 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 32 vs 2 threads
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
212
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€67.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €67.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10508 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Alder Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |