Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 1700 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G530 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G530 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 1700 is 2006 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G530.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G530
- Up to 93% cheaper than Ryzen 7 1700 - €20.16 vs €290.43
- Up to 93% better value when playing F1 22 than Ryzen 7 1700 - €0.08 vs €1.09 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 1700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700
- Performs up to 7% better in F1 22 than Celeron G530 - 267 vs 249 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G530 - 16 vs 2 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
249
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.08/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
Buy for €290.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G530 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 1700 |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |