Buy on Amazon
€60.24
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10980XE outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10980XE is 564 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 96% cheaper than Core i9-10980XE - €60.24 vs €1349.0
- Up to 95% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i9-10980XE - €0.41 vs €8.82 per FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Core i9-10980XE - 54 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10980XE doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10980XE
- Performs up to 5% better in Dead Space than Celeron G4900 - 153 vs 146 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 36 vs 2 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
146
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.24
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G4900 3,1 GHz verwendet Dual-Core Dual-Thread 54W CPU-Prozessor LGA 1151
Buy for €60.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 207 minutes ago
Intel Core i9-10980XE X-Serie Prozessor 18 Kerne mit 3.0 GHz (bis 4,8 GHz mit Turbo Boost 3.0, LGA2066 X299 Series 165W Prozessor (999PNC)
Buy for €1,349 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 207 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Core i9-10980XE
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i9-10980XE |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Cascade Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 18 |
| 2 | Threads | 36 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 165 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
