Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930T outperforms Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930T is 2410 days newer than Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Performs up to 1% better in HITMAN 3 than Core i7-875K - 189 vs 188 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i7-875K - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-875K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 8 vs 2 threads
HITMAN 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Core i7-875K
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Core i7-875K |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | May 30th, 2010 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Lynnfield |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
